Lecture 5 - Revision lecture
Topic 1: Introduction to Behavioral Finance and Traditional Finance Theories
[Part One – Introduction to Behavioral Finance]
- Overview of neoclassical economics
- (1) Preference Relation
- (2) Utility Function and Expected Utility Theory
- (3) Brief Introduction to Behavioural Finance
Normative model
- In a perfect world, what should be expected
[Part Two – Foundations of Finance]
- Foundations of Finance II: Asset Pricing, Market Efficiency and Agency Relationships
- (1) Risk and Return Relationship
- (2) CAPM model and Fama and French
- (3) Market Efficiency (brief introduction = > more details in Topic 3)
- (4) Agency Relationships and Corporate Governance
Part One
- Neocalssical economics (normative theory)
- Rational preferences
- Completeness
- Trainstivity
- Maximise utility
- The Expected Utility Theory of Prospect
- Properties of Utility Functions
- Certainty Equivalents
- Independent decisions based on all “relevant” information
- Introduction to Behavioural Finance
- Loss Aversion
- Representative
- Mental Accounting
- Fear of Regret
Three assumptions
- Should be rational
- 'In a perfect world' we say so that we can make predictions about the future
We should make decisions that maximise utility
- It should be an always upper sloping curve
- shape of utility will depend on preference
- Calculate expected utility
- Certainty equivalent, what prospects will give the same utility
- Risk averse, what should be the amount you are happy to get
Four common types of biases
- Mental accounting related to efficient market hypothesis
Part two
- Foundations of Finance
- Portfolio Risk & Return
- Portfolio Expected Return & Standard Deviations
- Efficient Frontier & CML
- CAPM Model
- Market Efficiency (more discussed in Lecture 3)
- Agency Relationships & Corporate Governance
- Agency Costs (Direct vs Indirect)
- traditional finance concepts
- Market efficiency
- Agency - direct and indirect costs
Everything related to traditional finance is in appendix
- go through appendix
Lecture 2
[Part One – Prospect Theory]
- Overview about Prospect Theory
- (1) Risk Aversion vs. Risk Seeking
- (2) Development of Prospect Theory
- Prospect Theory Value Function
- The Weighting Function
[Part Two – Mental Accounting]
- Mental Accounting
- (1) Integration vs. Segregation
- (2) Theater Ticker Problems
- (3) Opening and Closing Accounts
- Value function, how we deal with probability
- Mental accounting, how it affects how we make decisions
- Risk aversion vs Risk seeking vs Loss aversion
- Value Function
- Reference dependent
- Risk averse in positive domain
- Risk seeking in negative domain
- Loss aversion
- Weighting Function
- Overweighting low probabilities
- Underweighting medium-high probabilities
- Certainty effect
- Framing & Mental Accounting Effect
- Segregation vs Integration (reference point)
- Silver lining effect & House money effect

- With prospect theory, they are reference dependent
- reference point, status quo
- gaining or losing money will change how you deal with it
- Identify risk aversion versus loss aversion
- The reason why we make decisions are based on different reasons
- Risk aversion - minimise uncertainty
- Loss aversion - don't like the loss, avoid the potential of losing in the future
- may increase your risk taking
Value function
- which one is adding to loss aversion
Weighting function
- don't look at probabilities rationally
- psychological bias
- tend to overweight low probabilities
- medium to high probabilities, overweight it
- When something is certain, the weighting function is not biased - will always be one (and zero is zero)
Framing
- other biases affect
- Mental accounting with prospect theory - segregation vs integration
- People tend to integrate when you are winning money
- losing money, tend to segregate
- silver lining
- tend to segregate losses
- firms do that as well (taking the bath)
- do not tend to have lots of small losses - push to small positive earnings
- have a major losses announcement - higher chances of positive increase in next financial period
WILL NOT ASK HOW THE EQUATIONS ARE FORMED
- need to know how to calculate it
- prospect versus utility
Topic 3: Challenges to Market Efficiency
[Part One – Efficient Market Hypothesis]
- Overview of Efficient Market Hypothesis
- Theoretical foundations and assumptions
[Part Two – Challenges to Market Efficiency]
- Rationales supporting the Efficient Market Hypothesis
- Theoretical Challenges and Empirical challenges
Market Efficiency
- 3 levels of efficiency
- Implications: Better off do passive investing
- Random Walk vs. EMH
- “Prices are right” vs “No free lunch”
- Theoretical Foundations
- Universal Rationality
- Uncorrelated Errors
- Unlimited Arbitrage
- Rationales Supporting Efficiency vs Effective Trading Rules (Anomalies?)
EMH
- Only new information will affect the market
- People who are supporting market efficiency should only participate in pasive investing
- cannot beat the market, cannot do active investment
Random walk vs EMH
- Two scholars
- Random walk - no one can beat the market, then the price should be efficient
- Can't make the link - doesn't necessarily mean the price is correct
If was have a bunch of noise traders
- if they are correlated and forms a sentiment, can move the market
- not based on information (needs to add value) tradings on errors
- pushing the price away from the fundamental (cannot predict it)
- Cannot reject or support EMH
Theoretical foundations
- don't need all three
- universal rationality, can achieve EMH
- based on all relevant information
- If irrational investors decisions are uncorrelated, they will cancel out each other
- price moved by rational investors
- If we have unlimited arbitrage, opportunities to have risk free profit
Rationals supporting efficiencies
- all the anomalies, momentums,
- Should be at least semi-strong, should not be able to use past information
- Equal likely chance of spotting under/overreactions
- all the anomalies found could be due to methodologies
- Have to rely on asset pricing - man made models
- many adjustments, what is a universally affected method?
Arbitrage
- Triangular Arbitrage
- Limits to Arbitrage
- Fundamental Risk
- Noise-trader Risk
- Implementation Costs
- not unlimited
- triangular arbitrage (three trades)
Fundamental risk
- idiosyncratic risk
- capture fundamental risk
Noise trader risk
- systematic risk, before it gets better it can get worse
- try to push the price back, noise traders may form a sentiment
- cannot be eliminated or controlled
Implementation Costs
- costs, fees, spread, risk
- can be controlled but not eliminated
- even if you can get it, after the cost